BTW, For the same amount of money they wasted on a fine finish they could have incorporated the K/M aperture setting sensor. I know which "feature" I would rather have. JCO
-----Original Message----- From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 10:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DS You missed the point, finely finished cameras make sense if you are going to keep and use them for decades, it is well worth the extra cost. If you are going to $%#$#can the camera in a few years, who cares? JCO -----Original Message----- From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DS J. C. O'Connell wrote on 20.10.04 16:24: > Does the finish really matter on a camera that will > be obsolete in 5 years time? I know I would not want > to pay for better finish on temporary (dare I say disposable?) > camera... You're right. That's nothing but pleasure of handling nicely krafted camera in hands. That's one of the main reasons why so many people still likes their manual cameras very much. -- Best Regards Sylwek
