I took Bill's Zenitar 16/2.8 fish off his hands, and I've been happy with it. I don't use it a lot, but when I do I'm reminded of how great a lens it is. As I don't normally use a fish when I'm trying to make a subject look normal, I don't mind the slightly over-saturated colours; they add to the effect.
Chris On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:09:59 -0400, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:50:02 +0200 (MEST), Katrin M�ller-Sauer wrote: > > > I also have the Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye and have been really pleased > with it. As someone else mentioned, the colors are a bit more vivid > through this lens than my others, but it's also a sharp lens that > handles flare better than most of my non-Pentax lenses. It's built > like a tank, and my aperture ring is a little notchy, as someone else > also mentioned. But overall, it's the best $130 I've spent on a single > piece of camera gear, with the possible exception of the battery grip > for the MZ-S. Just remember that there are only so many uses for a > fisheye as compared to, say a 50/1.4. > > TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
