It looks quite pleasing, especially stopped down @ f/8, I have a range of 
67mm filters that I use with my A 35-105 F/3.5 and Tokina 17mm SL,  I try to 
buy lenses with filter sizes I already have (sounds crazy, I know) 49, 52, 
58, 67 & 77mm. I believe the 24-90 uses 67mm, I'd like a zoom that went as 
wide as 24mm, one of my favourite FL's.

John



---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:51:19 +0200
Subject: Re: Zoom vs Prime (Nov '04 P/Photo)

> I don't find the FA 24-90 to be bad. See some sample details, taken 
> with the *istD, here: 24mm: http://www.dariobonazza.com/t04p11e.htm 
> 28mm: http://www.dariobonazza.com/t04p12e.htm 90mm: 
http://www.dariobonazza.com/t04p13e.htm
> Even at 50mm, it is not bad. The main advantage of the prime lens is,
>  of course, its speed.
> 
> Dario Bonazza
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Whittingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:42 AM
> Subject: Re: Zoom vs Prime (Nov '04 P/Photo)
> 
> > I was thinking of replacing my FA 28-105 4/5.6 with the 24-90, just how
> bad
> > is it? Was the FA 50mm f/1.4 tested? Could I bribe you to scan me the test
> LOL
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > ---------- Original Message -----------
> > From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
> > Subject: Zoom vs Prime (Nov '04 P/Photo)
> >
> > > An article in the Nov '04 Pop Photo verifies that the
> > > performance gap between zooms and primes is ever
> > > narrowing. Actually, in one set of tests the zoom out
> > > performed the prime.
> > > I was both pleased and disappointed in the case of the
> > > Pentax lenses. I had been mulling the idea of
> > > replacing an FA 28-70 f/2.8 (glorious optic-but heavy)
> > > with an FA 24-90 f/3.5-4.5 (at 50mm) which was pitted
> > > against a 50mm f/1.7 AF (FA, F?).
> > > Think I'll hold off on the 24-90. It's only one SQF
> > > test, but not good. The 50mm results, however, were
> > > extremely good. In fact Pentax tests (both good and
> > > bad) stood out in the series.
> > > Another benign dilemma.
> > >
> > > Jack
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > ------- End of Original Message -------
> >
------- End of Original Message -------

Reply via email to