i have always considered my FA 24-90 merely adequate, even on film. it's not a lot worse than the DA 16-45 on my *istD, but it noticeable.
Herb... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Jolly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 7:43 AM Subject: Re: Zoom vs Prime (Nov '04 P/Photo) > Interesting - the only comment for that lens on Stan's site compares the > FA24-90 favourably to the legendary A35-105/3.5 in terms of optical > quality. I have the latter lens, and while it's probably not as sharp > as any of the 50s, it's remarkable for a zoom of its era.
