Phew!  I was concerned that your monitor, or maybe mine, was way out of
calibration.  

Thanks for the kind words.  I know that there's some thought that goes into
the QuikSnaps, but I don't think about it, if you know what I mean.  In
this case the couple is sort of an afterthought, as I'd already prepared
for photographing the shop when they came in.  Actually, I was a bit
annoyed at first as they "ruined" my shot.  But after they sat down (I so
hoped they'd get their cone to take away) I could see that they might add
something to the scene.

Anyway, your comments are well received.  Thanks again!

Shel 


> [Original Message]
> From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thank you, Ann, for doing a better job of explaining the way I see the
> photo than I did!  <vbg>.
>
> That's pretty much it, Shel.  My eye keeps going to the left, away
> from the couple.  It's not that they're in a dark corner, just that
> everything else is so bright, it feels dark in comparison.
>
> As to whether the couple is incidental, well, I almost get the feeling
> that they are.  For me as viewer, the shop is the main character, with
> it's bright counter and ceiling, bold lines and angles, and the couple
> seem an afterthought (not to say that they are, but that's the way I
> as viewer feel, looking at the photo)
>
> As I said before, I'm not saying that's a bad thing, just the way I
> perceive things is all.
>
> Interesting, though, that you say "...it's nothing more than a
> Quicksnap...", as if since you didn't plan the photo exquisitely, or
> didn't shoot of 1/2 a roll or more during the session, it isn't worth
> much.  Sometimes, Shel, (and I say this with great affection) you've
> gotta loosen up, and realize that just shooting from the hip has it's
> value from time to time.  You may think of it as a mere snapshot, but
> it's obvious that this is a Photograph, taken by someone who knows
> what they're doing.  You may not think that you accomplished much with
> this photo, other than to test a lens and work on exposure techniques,
> but it's obvious to me that's far from the truth.


Reply via email to