Ohh, what an impressive and well-reasoned argument you present. I can tell
from your sophisticated and balanced discourse that you must be a learned
and knowledgeable individual on all things politic. Well, spew forth then!

ObPentax: Recently picked up a nice M 135/3.5 to add to my kit. Nice price
and great optics really put this lens near the top of the
best-bang-for-the-buck list.

t

On 11/4/04 13:59, Peter J. Alling wrote:

> Tim, It's an un-moderated list, I've had plenty of time to learn about
> the people who should be
> known by as a danger to life liberty and property, (as well as
> happiness), I have as much right
> to vent as caveman and I have better ammunition.  Besides I've been on
> this list for longer than you
> have so I say right back at ya.
> 
> Tim Sherburne wrote:
> 
>> Peter, go away. You're only adding to the noise around here.
>> 
>> t
>> 
>> On 11/4/04 9:58, Peter J. Alling wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>> I'm not against Soros due to his conventional politics, it's his implied
>>> politics.  If you look at him objectively
>>> he's slime.  Elitist slime at that.  He wants to run my life and your
>>> life but do it from behind the scenes.  A least
>>> if the bastards do it in front of your face you can fight them.
>>> 
>>> Frantisek wrote:
>>> 
>>>    
>>> 
>>>> Thursday, November 4, 2004, 5:35:53 PM, Peter wrote:
>>>> PJA> Mishka if Soros were backing mother Tereisa I'd have vote against her.
>>>> 
>>>> And some people for her. What's the point? As Frank said, if some of
>>>> us poured our political views to the list, it would be a flaming
>>>> mess... Want me to start ;-) ?
>>>> 
>>>> Frantisek
>>>> 
>>>> radical anarchoenvirofeminigaylesbianosyndicalist who only time to time
>>>> accepts an
>>>> assignment from a megacorp to pay for his bread and butter <g>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>      
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
> 

Reply via email to