Actually no, I use old AF280T flashes. Since the MZ-3 and ZX5n don't seem to be capable of higher than
sync (125/100 respectively), speed flash I didn't see any point in upgrading to the AF400FTZ. The results with the AF280T are
very good as long as I keep within limitations imposed by the flashes output.


John Whittingham wrote:

It is in the LX, MZ-3 ZX5n in my experience. There have been problems reported with the *ist-d.



Hi Peter

Ever tried the MZ-3 ZX-5n with the AF400FTZ, would you care to comment on performance?

John


---------- Original Message ----------- From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:54:24 -0500 Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?



It is in the LX, MZ-3 ZX5n in my experience. There have been problems reported with the *ist-d.

David Zaninovic wrote:



I have given up on using the istD with TTL flash.
It is totally useless in this regard.




Shouldn't the TTL flash be more precise than auto flash ?






--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke


------- End of Original Message -------






--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to