Chris, I'm really happy to hear that you haven't been discouraged by the recent debate.
Let's hope that we will find a solution that will be acceptable to most members.
I am only adressing one of your suggestions here.
> We'll still have commentators to talk about photos, but only for the
> photographers each month who specifically request comments. I don't mind
> coordinating this, so we could give it a try and see how it goes. Since
> the PUG is not intended to be a critiqued gallery, send your request for
> comments to me, not Bill or the PUG. If you ask for comments in the
> letter you send to the PUGmeisters, it ain't gonna happen. All you have
> to do is send a letter to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] saying "My name is _____ and I want to have my
> photo commented on for the June PUG" or something like that, and it'll be
> done. You'll have to do this each month when you submit your photo, as
> there could be some months when you're showing an image that, for whatever
> reason, you don't want comments on.
( I F we decide on any form of "release" from the PUG participants:)
To me this seems like an unnecessary round of messages and extra work for you as well
as for the submitter.
Why not do it like this (it would be simple and it wouldn't really cost anyone any
extra work)?:
Each time we submit a photo for the PUG we can add whatever comments we like around
the picture, the shooting situation or whatever. Now, if comments on the list are
welcome, we just add something like "Comments on the PDML are welcome."
This wouldn't really cause anyone any extra work, and the possible commentator can
simply check for the above phrase.
(Or have I missed something?)
Lasse
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
