i bet, the differences at 3x5 print wouldn't have been obvious either. best, mishka
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:33:46 -0800, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <...> > While there may be some differences that become obvious at some point, they > were not obvious in a 5x7 print. I don't think the 100/2.8 macro in any > way "crushed" the K105/2.8 when the subject was a three dimensional object. > Results may be substantially different when photographing a two dimensional > object. > > Shel
