And the point of your erudite comment is? Shel
> [Original Message] > From: Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 11/13/2004 8:04:37 AM > Subject: Re: A Question About Macro Lenses > > i bet, the differences at 3x5 print wouldn't have been obvious either. > > best, > mishka > > On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:33:46 -0800, Shel Belinkoff > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <...> > > While there may be some differences that become obvious at some point, they > > were not obvious in a 5x7 print. I don't think the 100/2.8 macro in any > > way "crushed" the K105/2.8 when the subject was a three dimensional object. > > Results may be substantially different when photographing a two dimensional > > object. > > > > Shel
