the point is that your comment that i quoted was pointless. mishka
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 08:17:35 -0800, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And the point of your erudite comment is? > > Shel > > From: Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > i bet, the differences at 3x5 print wouldn't have been obvious either. > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While there may be some differences that become obvious at some point, > > > they were not obvious in a 5x7 print. I don't think the 100/2.8 macro > > > in any > > > way "crushed" the K105/2.8 when the subject was a three dimensional > > > object.
