Which, to me, suggests that the either your friend or the instructor conflated the recommended technique for introducing new interpolated data with the best way to solve a slightly different problem.
Shel Belinkoff mused: > > It seems you missed or misread my original post. I did try it, saw very > different results between several methods of reducing file size, and was > trying to ascertain if there is some technique other than the one I used > which will give better results. I brought up the subject because a friend > of mine took a Photoshop class and her instructor recommended the step > technique for reducing the file size. > > Shel > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 11/13/2004 2:56:01 AM > > Subject: Re: Reducing File Size with Photoshop > > > > I personally can't think of a reason why reducing the size of an image > > step-wise would be beneficial, but YMMV as always, and for a definitive > > answer, you should simply try it and see if you can see a difference. :-) > > > > S > >
