Hi,

http://www.luminous-landscape.com

Regards


--- Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Bruce,
> I know Frans Lanting did a project of American
> landscapes with a
> peculiar digital camera, but apart from him I don't
> know of any
> landscapers working with digital MedF. I've been
> lookinga round a
> little to find some.
> 
> Do you have any links?
> 
> Jostein
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 5:50 PM
> Subject: Re: 20x30" from 6MP?
> 
> 
> > Chris,
> >
> > A nice synopsis.  I was shooting two 67ii's before
> moving to
> digital.
> > I know what medium format looks like and 35mm
> film.  I concur that
> for
> > very fine detail, that film holds an edge.
> >
> > What many fail to realize is that for the buying
> public (largely
> > weddings/portraits) they are not looking for fine
> detail.  They
> don't
> > want to see skin imperfections and don't really
> want to view 20X30's
> > from a few inches away.  The lack of grain and
> color vibrancy of the
> > digital images gives them a wonderful look even
> when blown up to
> large
> > sizes.
> >
> > If I was shooting landscapes for a living, I would
> either be using a
> > medium format digital back or medium format/large
> format film.
> Since
> > the money that I make from photography (part-time
> work only) is
> purely
> > from people shots, 6mp dslr is serving me very
> well.  My clients are
> > just as happy with the product as they were when I
> was shooting 67.
> >
> > Thanks for such a clear description of what is
> going on.
> >
> > -- 
> > Best regards,
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> > Thursday, November 18, 2004, 8:30:00 AM, you
> wrote:
> >
> > CB> I don't own a DSLR, but I own 35mm and MedF
> bodies, and I work
> at a
> > CB> camera store/lab, so I've seen countless
> enlargements from all
> > CB> formats, including DSLRs.  I've noticed that
> film, even 35mm,
> seems
> > CB> better able to capture really fine details. 
> If I want a print I
> can
> > CB> examine extremely closely, I'm going with
> film, even if it's
> only
> > CB> 35mm.
> >
> > CB> However, for some reason, possibly the
> complete lack of grain,
> DSLR
> > CB> prints enlarge much nicer than 35mm and, if
> you go large enough,
> even
> > CB> better than MedF.  Sure the prints begin to
> fall apart if you
> walk
> > CB> right up to them, but at a reasonable viewing
> distance, DSLR
> prints
> > CB> look amazing.  I'm so used to seeing grain on
> enlargements
> bigger than
> > CB> 20x30 that it's mindblowing to see its
> absence.
> >
> > CB> MedF, which is all I shoot now, is a good
> compromise right now
> between
> > CB> the complete lack of grain of digital and the
> smaller negative
> size of
> > CB> 35mm.  It looks pretty good when enlarged to
> poster size (the
> grain
> > CB> isn't usually too objectionable), and it holds
> fine detail
> > CB> exceptionally well.  Of course MedF kits are
> not as cheap,
> portable or
> > CB> feature-laden as 35mm or DSLR bodies, so
> there's definitely a
> > CB> downside, but it works for me right now.
> >
> > CB> Chris
> >
> > CB> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:19:38 -0800, Bruce
> Dayton
> > CB> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Bill,
> > >>
> > >> From his previous posts, I get the feeling that
> he is a strong
> film
> > >> advocate who is trying to prove that digital
> (DSLR -35mm) isn't
> good
> > >> enough yet.  Seems that I remember that he
> doesn't have a DSLR
> yet and
> > >> is going through the math calisthenics like
> many others.
> > >>
> > >> I can say, that I am having better luck blowing
> up *istD shots of
> > >> portraits, families and weddings than I ever
> had shooting 35mm
> with
> > >> equivalent best glass from Pentax.  My clients
> are plenty happy
> with
> > >> the last eleven 20X30's that I have delivered.
> > >>
> > >> Bruce
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 


=====
Albano Garcia
Photography & Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.com.ar
 
 

 





                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com 
 

Reply via email to