And about that Florida property...

arnie wrote:

dust is definitely an issue

i'll take the 35, 77 and 300

arnie

----- Original Message ----- From: "TIMOTHY STARK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: Gear for Sale/ *istD question


I am an occaisional lurker from Vancouver BC. I have a shelf full of 645 gear I am no longer using.

This includes mint: 300mm 4.0 ED IF and 35mm 3.5

Very clean, no dings or scratches: 55 2.8, 150 3.5

clean with some marking: 645 body, 75mm 2.8 (not LS), 120 film holder.

If anyone wishes to contact me, return e-mail. I can be reached at my office at 1-800-655-4553 (from anywhere in Canada or US). The switchboard is a Coldwell-Banker office, ask for Timothy Stark.

Have any of the *istD shooters run into the "ccd dust issue" and is it really an issue when switching lenses? So when I get one of the digital bodies, should I go with a zoom to minimize lens changes? If yes does anyone want my FA 24, 35 2.0 AF, 77 or FA*300???

Thank you









--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to