On 24/11/04, Larry Cook, discombobulated, unleashed: >You are right about Pentax. The availability of the Sigma 120-300 lens >is the one thing that has caused me to seriously consider switching to >Nikon or Canon. The majority of my current shooting is my son's soccer >which is often at night. I have an 80-200 f2.8 but it is just not long >enough to reach the entire field adequately. The 120-300 would >accomplish this. I have a 100-300 but it is an f4 and that just isn't >fast enough for the night games. I have made do with what I have but >often wonder if switching would be better. So far the *istD has kept me >at the Pentax home.
So let me get this right: you're considering switching from Pentax to either Nikon or Canon because they're better supported by *Sigma* ?? Surely if you switch to N or C you do so for other reasons like IS, VR, upgrade paths, etc? Or do you hold shares in Sigma?? ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
