-- Original Message -- >addition to losing the prominent display of film speed, the new four-roll >consumer packaging will also *not* include a picture of the four enclosed film >cassettes. Apparently this is too confusing or complicated for consumers as >well? The packaging will no longer indicate "96 EXP", but rather the more >arithmetically tractable "4 ROLLS" Well, yeah. I mean you'd run out of fingers and toes to count on *long* before you got to 96. I'm also expecting them to add a disclaimer stating: "NOT FOR USE IN DIGITAL CAMERAS" ;-) - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- RE: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy truth: the d... Peifer, William [OCDUS]
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy truth: ... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy trut... Peter Alling
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy ... William Robb
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy truth: ... William Robb
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy truth: ... Robert Harris
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy trut... Robert Harris
- Re[2]: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the slop... Bob Walkden
- Re: Re[2]: Nasty Kodak rumor, or ... Hern�n Mouro
- OT Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the slop... petit miam
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy truth: ... admin
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy trut... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy ... Buford Terrell
- Re[2]: Nasty Kodak rumor, or the sloppy t... Bob Walkden

