Unless I'm buying ProPacks that only come in 36s, I
prefer the 24s. Often I'll process rolls with only 12 - 18 frames
exposed and the wastage is a little less. Also the standard
negative file sheets for 36 are unsatisfactory -- those that
hold 36 frames won't contact print on 8x10 and the ones
that do only hold 35 frames.
At 09:10 AM 05/10/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
>> We're
>> used to a "standard" roll being 36 exposures, a short roll at 24
>> exposures, and with few exceptions, that's the way it's been.
>
>Actually, the sales figures show us that in consumer films, 24s outsell
>36s and 12s by a country mile, which, I suppose, makes a 24 a "standard"
>roll. It's already happenning, Shel! :(
>
>-Aaron
>
>
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
Buford C. Terrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Law (713) 646-1857
South Texas College of Law
1303 San Jacinto Houston, TX 77002
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
A deep respect for Law requires intense skepticism
toward every law.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
