Re: Proof if proof were needed

[Tom C]

I've always wondered about this... unless the same FL len is set up on the 
same tripod, aligned at exactly the same angle, there's little chance a 
series of shots will appear an identical comparison.

I've had a little too much Wisers Canadian Whiskey... yum it's good 
though... 10 yr. variety.

Tom C.

From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Proof if proof were needed
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:51:59 +1000
On 15 Dec 2004 at 23:41, Cotty wrote:
> On 15/12/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Y'know what else seems odd ... the 15mm appears to have a wider angle 
of
> >view, unless you moved somewhat during the test.  If you did, then 
never
> >mind, but if you didn't, take a good look at the framing of the two 
pics. Am I
> >mistaken?
>
> I'm pretty sure I moved a bit ;-)

Didja have a yer wobbly boot on? :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998