Film is dead??? Anybody need links to places that (still) sell film??? Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 14. december 2004 15:24 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: Fw: The film is dead Comparing a fairly large (11x14?) print from both. In my experience they look much different from each other. Which is better is a to a large extent a matter of taste. Very experienced old hands will probably still prefer the optical print. Those with less knowledge and/or experience at evaluating photographic prints will problably prefer the digital. graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- Shel Belinkoff wrote: > What would be a fair or reasonable test? > > Shel > > > >>[Original Message] >>From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>More to the point, they are comparing scanned film to digital. >>They are really comparing whatever scanner they are using to a >>digital camera. >> >>The fair comparison is to compare a high quality optical print to >>digital. >>Do that, and yer 6 megapixie dslr starts to look like cheap junk. > > > >
