For me it would be very simple. I have not used a film camera in over two years and I see little reason to for the foreseeable future. As nice as the MZ-S is, and it does seem to be a very nice camera by the specs although I've not handled one, it would be the one to go.
Godfrey --- wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (didn't see it turn up on list so re-sending from different > a/c) > > Thinking aloud. This is sort of a little quiz to help > me make up my mind. > Here's the situation: I will be selling some gear to > help fund another, pretty pricey, purchase. > > I have a 20D, 10D, *istD and MZ-S > > The 20D is staying. The 10D is definitely going. One > of either the *istD or the MZ-S will be going. The > question is: which one? > I'm not a great user of wide-angle lenses so that > digital crop/film argument is irrelevant (the 18-55 I > bought with the istD has yet to be used). The other > lenses I own - 43, 77, 300, 24-90 work all equally > well with digital and film. I'm about 85% certain > about which of the two cameras I'll be selling. I > don't have any specific requirements for the camera > I'll be keeping (the Canon is my dogsport camera - > that has a specific purpose) > > My question to you all is - which would you sell/keep > and why? > > Wendy > --- > Wendy Beard > Ottawa, Canada > http://www.beard-redfern.com > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
