I use w/a a fare amount. In fact I rather like fisheyes so I'd keep the MZ-S. OTOH
I've fallen very deeply in like with the *ist-D. It'll be a difficult choice.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 1/27/2005 1:51:44 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a 20D, 10D, *istD and MZ-S


The 20D is staying. The 10D is definitely going. One
of either the *istD or the MZ-S will be going. The
question is: which one?
I'm not a great user of wide-angle lenses so that
digital crop/film argument is irrelevant (the 18-55 I
bought with the istD has yet to be used). The other
lenses I own - 43, 77, 300, 24-90 work all equally
well with digital and film. I'm about 85% certain
about which of the two cameras I'll be selling. I
don't have any specific requirements for the camera
I'll be keeping (the Canon is my dogsport camera -
that has a specific purpose)

My question to you all is - which would you sell/keep
and why?

Wendy
=============
I'd keep the MZ-S. It's not a bad idea to have one film camera in reserve. It's very nice. And unless you want all mechanical, you might be hard pressed to come up with a better SLR.


While the *istD will definitely be supplanted some day by a better DSLR. Even a better Pentax DSLR. ;-)

Marnie aka Doe






--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to