Hi Francis,
Good for you for the ingenuity displayed here and the results. I think number 
three is quite good. Nice framing, good composition. I agree with Rob that you 
can get much better results with a different setup, but you did make the most 
of what you have. that's a good thing. Keep shooting.
Paul


> On 3 Feb 2005 at 0:13, Francis wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> > I dropped by a local waterfall today and was experimenting with the long 
> > exposure setting on my family's new digital p&s. It goes down to 4sec, 
> > which is 3sec longer than my SLR (one of my main gripes about the P3n), but 
> the
> > aperture doesn't close very far so I was holding a lens from my dismembered
> > sunglasses in front of it. By the time I had hiked in I only had fifteen 
> minutes
> > to actually take pictures but here is what I got.
> > 
> > http://www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/waterfalls.html
> > 
> > Brutal critiques appreciated.
> 
> Hi Francis,
> 
> Your use of the dismembered sun-glasses was a good use of available resources 
> and seemed to produce the effect you desired however I'm not sure that they 
> would have been the optimum solution :-)
> 
> Just a few comments on the slow shutter technique. For this to work at the 
> most 
> basic level you really have to be able to record the subtleties of tone in 
> the 
> flowing water that you have blurred. In the first and last images of the 
> sequence in particular there are areas of interest that are patently burnt 
> out 
> or lack detail. 
> 
> I suspect that your new digital p&s may be part of your problem here, they 
> generally have no where near the brightness capture latitude of a decent DSLR 
> or good film. If you are interested in pursuing this type of photography and 
> if 
> you can't open the P3n for longer than 1sec maybe you should hunt down a 
> cheap 
> mechanical body (and maybe a decent ND filter or two) that will allow cable 
> release controlled time exposures. My guess is that you'd end up producing 
> far 
> better shots technically with a little experimentation and little cash 
> outlay.  
> 
> FWIW #4 is my favourite of the set. #2 seems to be a broken link.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
> 

Reply via email to