Not everyone is a master of the basics. Simple examples like these were what showed my
daughter (just a snap shooter with no intentions of being anything else) why all her
mall
photos were washed out (no flash) or had dark backgrounds (flash) and that high speed
film
was what she needed. Now she thinks about what film she wants to use where. The
examples
are seriously basic, but frankly, you'll have to point out the "lie" to me, because I
don't see it.
Note that I removed the offensive html from the original post before replying.
Regards,
Bob...
-------------------------------
"In the carboniferous epoch
we were promised perpetual peace.
They swore if we gave up our weapons
that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed they sold us,
and delivered us, bound, to our foe.
And the gods of the copybook headings said,
'Stick to the devil you know.' "
--Rudyard Kipling
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has anyone seen this? Here's url:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/corp/researchDevelopment/productFeatures/pictures.s
html?
This is just plain manipulative IMHO. Show someone an underexposed photo, and
then one properly exposed. For anyone who can spell ISO and knows the
difference between 100 and 400, this is just wrong. Kodak might not be
intentionally "dumbing down america", but they sure are telling some creative
lies to get a product off of the shelf.
Brent (listed name here was formerly bigtoeno2 in case someone cares)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
