Nice shots, Bruce! Yeah, I am regretting that I didn't shell out for an istD...but I was expecting the "next generation" to come along this spring or summer.
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is a play that I shot last year on digital - > mix of 800 and 1600 > ISO, some lenses were as slow as 5.6, but usually > around 2.8 - 4.0. > http://www.daytonphoto.com/Galleries/OJHPlay/index.htm > > This is really where the digital realm shines - you > can set white > balance without loss of light and the high ISO's are > much nicer than > super grainy films at that speed. > > I wish you luck, man. It is quite fun to shoot. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Monday, February 28, 2005, 7:41:07 AM, you wrote: > > RW> I'm going to be shooting a high school play in a > few > RW> days. The lighting isn't great, and since I'll > be > RW> using the 80-320 zoom on my PZ-1p a fair amount > I'd > RW> like to keep the shutter speed respectable. > > RW> Would I be better off (1) using 800-speed film > and > RW> underexposing it by a stop; (2) using 800-speed > film > RW> and asking the lab to push it; or (3) using 1600 > speed > RW> film? > > RW> I used (3) a few years ago, and the grain was > rather > RW> coarse. > > RW> Rick > > RW> > __________________________________________________ > RW> Do You Yahoo!? > RW> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > RW> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
