On 31 Mar 2005 at 2:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> You ton't get a well spec'd FF, but you will get a well spec'd APS. As sensor
> technology evolves, the resolution and noise levels of the APS sensors will
> improve significantly. I don't see any real downside.

Quantum physics have played a nasty little trick on sensor designers and has 
provided the limitations gratis. Of course there is still room for 
technological improvement like improved read circuits and better micro-lenses 
but it's never going to be terribly significant using even advanced 
semiconductor technologies. Pattern noise may be able to be tackled using new 
software algorithms and/or speed saving on-chip NR (like the new sensor in the 
20D at 6.4um) but thermal noise is random and is a direct function of the size 
of the sensor pixel.

If resolution is increased per surface area then noise and latitude will 
suffer. 5.5-7um square pixels offer about the best resolution vs noise 
compromise and the *ist D is already using 7um pixels. The only way that a D645 
can offer better performance is to use a lower density sensor i.e. 9um square 
pixels (KAF-18000CE), which means in essence that they can get away with using 
their old lens designs without them looking like crap.

> With 12mm glass, the wide
> end will be covered. I wouldn't be suprised to see a 10 or 12mm DA prime. And
> from what I've read, the Pentax mount is not conducive to full frame 35mm. If
> one must have more than APS, the 645 is a good alternative.

Not for anyone who just wants a single body to use all their very capable 35mm 
glass. I would be interested to see how they fare with a 10 or 12mm DA prime 
given their results with the 14mm (which I don't particularly like).

> It may not be full
> frame 645, but it's larger than full-frame 35. So what's the downside. It 
> won't
> be hard to produce some very wide lenses for the 645. In any case, it seems 
> that
> this is how Pentax is going to work it. They wouldn't be discontinuing the FA
> lenses and replacing them with DA if a full frame 35 was in the future. 

But the new lenses are full frame.


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

Reply via email to