Mark wrote: > But if you can't afford the full-frame now, what difference does it > make? I have considered going Canon, too, but the "full-frame upgrade > path" is, for all practical purposes, no more accessible to me with > Canon than it is with Pentax. And conversely, the full-frame upgrade > path is just as accessible to me now with Pentax as it would be if I > switched to Canon!
The point is that they are all constructed arguments for someone wanting a 20D more than a *istDS. It is about rationalization of a purchase. Mind you, I think it is perfectly OK to want a Canon more than a Pentax. P�l
