----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 12:03 PM Subject: RE: Speaking of exposure....
> To answer all three of your posts: > I did nothing in RAW conversion so you could see the > untouched image, looking at the histogram it looks > quite underexposed to me. Am I reading it wrong? > I tend to wonder myself about the color sensitivity > of the D's meter. > Seems full sun and flash give 90%+ accurate exposures > while any "out of the ordinary" lighting is inconsistent. > Has anyone else noticed this? Yes. With the D, just about every shot in mixed lighting of my kid's performances looked underexposed. Some work and tweaking in ACR improved the shots. I think it may have something to do with poor exposure capability with high ISO settings but never tested nor confirmed this. I just lived with it.... No attempts yet at this kind of photography with the 20D yet, but I'm thinking it will most likely react the same way. Christian
