Dario wrote: > I'm not argumenting the choice of 3-segment AF here. That can be fine. > I only ask why the hell they have to mess-up things that way. Whay don't > they call the damn thing SAFOX IV, SAFOXIX (ah, ah), SAFOX L, or SAFOX > WHATEVER? Why SAFOX VIII (which is another thing)?
Maybe it is SAFOX V and the rest is printing error in the specifications? Pål
