man, would you ever learn to read? i haven't said "others have better finder" or "k-lenses don't work". they do.
i said, the finder is lousy (and i check it in b&h today: it is lousy). and the mount is crippled. read the sentence above again. rinse. repeat. best, mishka On 6/3/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Look through the viewfinder of any dslr. I haven't seen one that's > better than the *istD. As for the mount, if you had ever used the > camera, you would know that it works great with K and M lenses. It's > not even an issue. You tap the green button to meter. Not a problem. > Easier than metering with many Pentax film cameras. It's interesting > that you're so adamant about this, but you haven't tried it yourself. > Very strange. > Paul > On Jun 3, 2005, at 7:23 AM, Mishka wrote: > > > i looked through the finder. it sucks. i don't care that canon rebel > > has a worse one. > > the *istd finder still sucks. > > the mount is crippled. > > > > but i meant my email not as criticism of *istD*, quite on contrary. > > > > best, > > mishka > > > > On 6/3/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The Pentax digital mount is not crippled in any way. The viewfinder is > >> quite possibly the best of any digital SLR. > >> Paul > >> On Jun 2, 2005, at 11:09 PM, Mishka wrote: > > > >
