On 6/8/05, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ain't that the truth! One of the things I get more than a little fed up > with on the 'net is what Michael Reichmann calls "pixel peeping"; > nit-picking images on computer monitors, at magnifications equivalent to > 60-inch image width. Or equivalent to 2-inch image width. > > When the prints come out the bullsh*t stops. One of the things I *love* > about PDML get-togethers is the opportunity to see actual real prints by > the many talented folks on this list. Yes, Ken Waller's photos really do > rock. > > And by the way, Franks street shots look about 10 times better (though > not necessarily sharper - HAR!) in the beautiful prints he brought down. >
Thanks, Mark. That goes for your shots (and everyone else's, too). Proper prints are the way to judge a print. Your panos are amazing, as are the rest of yours, in print form. I especially liked the droplets on the blue car hood. Amazing in print. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
