> >As a long-time user of the TIFF format for somewhat unrelated >purposes, I feel most inclined to comment on this note: > > Tiffs don't have any of the post-processing advantages of RAW > >Which is obviously untrue, since TIFF (unlike JPEG) won't >usually compress data by throwing actual image data away, and >also has the capability of storing 12 bits-per-channel (well, >actually, it will have to be be 0-padded 16-bit, but...) >
And there's one more thing people tend to forget - each time one opens, possibly modifies and saves a JPEG back to the file more of the image data gets thrown away. Even with high quality JPEGs these things do accumulate ... Cheers, Leon
