it's just a question of critical mass. Every time things have changed (8 to 16-bit to 32-bit, 86 to 286 to 38s, Dos to Windows, etc.) the same stories have been churned out and the same prophets have predicted doom.
-- Cheers, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: Thibouille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 June 2005 10:53 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: For those considering WindowsXP 64bit > > No. But still interesting to notice that a major company does > not want to get involved with developing drivers for that OS. > > 2005/6/18, Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > to install The Only True OS (that is, linux)? > > > > but, in the end, canon claims that it's a lousy software company. > > is that a news? > > > > mishka > > > > On 6/17/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Thibouille" > > > Subject: For those considering WindowsXP 64bit > > > > > > > > > > Just read this: > > > > http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24004 > > > > > > > > We'd better wait... > > > > > > It's pretty much a rehash of what Microsoft themselves is saying, > > > other than the self serving pap from Canon. > > > I do wonder why I bothered to buy a 64 bit processor, if the > > > software writers are going to refuse to support it. > > > > > > William Robb > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > ---------------------- > Thibouille > ---------------------- > *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ... > > > >
