Michael Spivak suggested the idea of separating the boy from the rest of
the photo by blurring the background. Additionally Jerome Reyes had a
good point that the title doesn't fit the photo at all. In retrospect I
should of left it untitled, I can't come up with a well fitting title.
Here's my take on that idea with a similar photo taken right after the
first after the first (its a rough draft, I'm too tired at the moment to
go through and blend the blur correctly)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/22099681/
I like it but it changes the subject of the photo, less about the
interaction of multiple people and more about the boy.
David Volkert wrote:
I don't normally do street photography (at least I think this can be
considered street photography but the lens is a bit on the large side
and it was an event) but the opportunity presented itself today.
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/21768115/
*Ist D, Sigma 135-400mm @ 135mm, F/9.5, and 1/500th
Personally I'd wish for more depth of field on the kid and less on the
people in the background but I still like it.
Comments appreciated.
