Herb, 
FWIW, I've only used Panorama Maker on a few panos, (all tripod mounted and 
levelled with lenses from around 50mm up to 300mm) but the ease of obtaining 
great results makes it a winner in my book. My *istD pano's have been mistaken 
for larger format images & no one has been able to pick out where the stitching 
was done. 

Kenneth Waller

-----Original Message-----
From: Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Arcsoft Panorama Maker

i got around to installing the copy (Panorama Maker 2000) that came bundled 
with my Nikon Coolpix 5000 and tried stitching a few images together with it 
and then comparing with the program i use most of the time, iSeemedia 
Photovista Panorama 3.0. my conclusion is that Photovista is still the 
better program, but not by much. the areas where Panorama Maker are weaker 
are in tuning for the lens barrel/pincushion distortion and focal length. in 
terms of blending, it does about as well as Photovista, which means it is 
one of the best. in terms of automatic alignment, i don't think is is quite 
as good as Photovista, but it is very close. it is able to cope reasonably 
well with foliage-only matches and slight tilting caused by hand holding the 
series of images. Photovista does better. Panorama Maker has an easier to 
use interface and supports direct output of QTVR files. with Photovista, you 
have to use a 3rd party program to create QTVR files, and the user interface 
is strange, to say the least.

i have played with probably about a dozen programs for stitching panoramas 
including VRToolbox Panoworx, Ulead Cool360, PanaVue ImageAssembler, Realviz 
Stitcher Express, and more that i can't remember. the two i use are 
Photovista and Stitcher Express. i beleive that Panorama Tools is the best 
tool out there, and it's free too, but without a 3rd party GUI that you pay 
for, it's not easy to use. given that, i would rather work with a for pay 
tool that comes in one piece. both Stitcher Express and Photovista require 
somewhere between 20 to 50% overlap between successive images. i aim for the 
full 50%. Panorama Tools allows nearly 0% overlap with a successful stitch, 
but i don't use it.

Photovista is best for scenes where there are no definite patterns and 
straight lines that need to be kept straight as it's long and tedious to 
tune the lens to get everything right. close enough works well with 
Photovista and produces results that look correct even under close 
inspection. Stitcher Express is needed when there are strong patterns or 
lines that have to be matched and geometrically aligned correctly. if there 
aren't any, Stitcher Express usually fails to align the images and that 
means you can't create the panorama since manual alignment seldom works.

Panorama Maker seems to be in-between with respect to ability to handle or 
require patterns and lines. if you haven't got anything, it's a good choice. 
if you have specific needs, you probably want to look at Photovista, 
Stitcher Express, and Panorama Tools and decide which one, or several might 
be needed to improve your stitched panoramas.

Herb.... 




________________________________________
PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com

Reply via email to