What Don said.
Inkjet and dye sublimation printing technologies are much better for
photographic work today.
There are some new, high-end volume printing machines using
electrostatic transfer (the basis for laser printers) coming into the
market, but they're targeted at volume printing work.
Godfrey
On Aug 3, 2005, at 9:27 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
They have neither the resolution or density control of a good
inkjet.
Photos printed on them remind me of a Sunday comic strip.
Great for letters and grapics, though rather expensive to feed.
These printers are getting cheaper and cheaper. How does the quality
compare with a good inkjet (for printing photos)?
Are they worth considering, or do they have a long way to go?
