No, it applies to private transactions as well.
Chris does have it right about the seller having the right
to wait until it is reasonably clear that the shipment has
been lost or destroyed and not just temporarily gone astray
before reimbursing the buyer. Most shipping companies demand
two month before they will pay on the insurance.
--Tom
Paul Jones wrote:
>
> Wouldnt this only be in regards to a business shipping the item? A think a
> transaction between two individuals would be a total different deal.
>
> Paul
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 12:17 PM
> Subject: Re: eBay rip-off -- follow-up
>
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, William Robb wrote:
> >
> > > And Bob and I agree.
> > > SO THERE!!!
> > > William Robb
> >
> > If the seller is legally responsible for proving that the item arrived in
> > the buyer's hands, then that pretty much negates my argument. I learn
> > something new every day... and sometimes two things. :) I would only add
> > that it seems logical for the seller to try and locate the package before
> > mailing a refund. Provided that that's accomplished in a reasonable
> > length of time, that seems like a natural step to me.
> >
> > chris
> >
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> >
> >
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
