On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Bob Blakely wrote:
> It sounds like the seller is responsible to the customer for the camera or
> the price of the camera. The seller's recourse is to the shipping agent he
> contracted with.
Would this be to Canada Post or the one in Albano's country? Canada Post
will argue that they performed their job properly in shipping to his
country. It sounds like the post office of Albano's country would be the
key to resolving this.
> I'm not sure about the buyer's recourse to the seller's refusal to
> step up to the plate regarding his responsibility. Normally this would
> be a small claims court sort of thing, but what jurisdiction can the
> buyer file in? Must he go to the seller's jurisdiction to obtain
> justice?
But how would Albano prove it? The seller can no doubt show proof that
they shipped the camera to his country and that it arrived there. Albano,
OTOH, of course cannot prove that he didn't receive it. This could be
tricky.
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
