"Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Very, very few buildings are under copyright here in the US. Only a few and >they use their edifice as their LOGO. If you use a photo of their edifice >for commercial use, it implies their endorsement. If you just sell a photo >of their edifice for the photo's artistic value, they are probably without >complaint.
Right. Selling it as a fine art print, for example, should be OK (though these corporations often have sufficient legal funds available to make your life miserable even if you're in the right). Put it in your stock photo portfolio and there'll be big trouble. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
