On Aug 19, 2005, at 5:33 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
The FA 100-300mm sucks. The others I don't know. ...
Is the FA100-300 the same optically as the F100-300/4.5-5.6? I know it isn't quite the performer that the 80-320 or F70-210 are supposed to be, and it's not particularly great wide open, but I find it hard to ascribe the word "sucks" to performance like this:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/21s.htm (Click on the image in this page for a larger, high resolution version.) Godfrey
