Judging from the picture: <http://homepage.mac.com/godders/DS-28-105comp.jpg> The 28-105 at a DS looks like a really strange combo. While extending the lens, the camera body seems to shrink. Why? Does the lens absorb parts of the body or what? Very peculiar, indeed.
Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian.) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -----Original Message----- From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20. august 2005 04:14 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Help me pick a Pentax Zoom Lens (please) And I got complaints about how silly the 43 ltd in silver looks on a D... Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2005, at 2:18 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: > >> As for the 28-105, sans voir the PZ is going to be unnecessarily >> heavier and slower than the lastest 28-105/3.2-4.5 which people like >> a lot. > > > I have no experience with the 28-105 PZ lens, but have the current > FA28-105/3.2-4.5 AL IF. Small, light, and extremely good quality for > $210 new. Here's a picture of a silver finish model, fitted with a > standard Kalt 58mm lens hood, mounted on the *ist DS body: > > http://homepage.mac.com/godders/DS-28-105comp.jpg > > Godfrey > > -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout).
