I guess that's where I am. Is this a time to re-evaluate everything and start some longer term plans to slowly upgrade (starting with this), or do I just find another F70-210 or equivelant. I know if I came across a Camera store in rural Newfoundland, I would have (well tried to) bought anything in the range.
dk On 8/22/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Dave Kennedy wrote: > > > Any idea what that lens will be and when it'll be released? > > No. They won't tell us, I don't think :-) > > > I'm trying to figure out how to replace it. Do I go with the 50-200? > > Are you digital-only? If yes (or if you don't mind a bit of vignetting > at the low end), people here like it. > > > I > > was also toying with saving up for a Tokina or Sigma 70-200/2.8. > > Different class in terms of weight and size; if that's OK, then comes > price. > > > life was so easy when I didn't NEED a lens. 'Course trying to justify > > spending $$$ on a lens after holidays won't be the easiest thing > > either. > > Good luck :-) I will wait for the FF 50-200; if that comes as a > reasonably priced replacement for the F70-210, I will be able to sell > at least the F35-135 and the F70-210, maybe even the FA24-90. Perhaps > you can do some similar restructuring, just an idea. > > Kostas > >
