In a message dated 9/13/2005 2:42:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I think that and proper attributation are a matter of common sense. In other words >putting it into the FAQ won't help much. But if everyone wants it there, I will be >glad to update it.
>graywolf >http://www.graywolfphoto.com "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Yes, I saw your comment about that earlier (yesterday?) and forgot to add > that to the list. Since there are times when the original post neither > makes it to the list nor into the archives, some people may only have a > chance to see the URL in one of the replies to the original message. Is > this worthy of putting into the Graywolf FAQ? > > Shel ================ Yes. I must say most people are pretty good about quoting the original url. But those are people that have been on the list for a while and realize it's a problem. It would be good to put it in for newbies. Mention the reason, that sometimes people do not see the original post and only see the subsequent replies, so they need to see the url in the replies. And that has been a list etiquette that has evolved over time to deal with that. Also, as a reminder too, as sometimes people forget. Other than that, sorry, I am an unrepentant bottom poster. :-) Marnie aka Doe However, when I am just LOLing or something I snip the original post a lot. Yous takes whats yous get. :-)
