That is okay as I see your name and scroll down. However, often I browse 
through the list click, read, delete. If someone bottom posts the middle step 
is often skipped if I am in any kind of hurry because I do not scroll unless 
the comment catches my interest. If I can not see it in the window without 
scrolling it can not do that.

Bottom posting is something that is left over from the old dial up and download 
uucp days. Come on guys it is not 1972 anymore.

graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/13/2005 2:42:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I think that and proper attributation are a matter of common sense. In other

words >putting it into the FAQ won't help much. But if everyone wants it there, I will be >glad to update it.


graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com

"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------


Shel Belinkoff wrote:

Yes, I saw your comment about that earlier (yesterday?) and forgot to add
that to the list.  Since there are times when the original post neither
makes it to the list nor into the archives, some people may only have a
chance to see the URL in one of the replies to the original message.  Is
this worthy of putting into the Graywolf FAQ?

Shel

================
Yes. I must say most people are pretty good about quoting the original url. But those are people that have been on the list for a while and realize it's a problem. It would be good to put it in for newbies. Mention the reason, that sometimes people do not see the original post and only see the subsequent replies, so they need to see the url in the replies. And that has been a list etiquette that has evolved over time to deal with that.

Also, as a reminder too, as sometimes people forget.
Other than that, sorry, I am an unrepentant bottom poster. :-)

Marnie aka Doe However, when I am just LOLing or something I snip the original post a lot. Yous takes whats yous get. :-)




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.25/102 - Release Date: 9/14/2005

Reply via email to