What I was asking about, and commenting upon, is that I find it strange
that ~you~ wouldn't know why you liked your own work.

Every time you edit your photos you're critiquing your work.  When you
shoot a roll of 36 and decide to print but one or two, you've made an
editorial decision, decided which is acceptable and which is not.  I would
think that if you understood why you liked a photo, what made it work for
you, it might be helpful. 

I'm just trying to have a conversation with you frank, open a little
dialogue.  Sounds like I've offended or annoyed you in some way.  

Shel 


> [Original Message]
> From: frank theriault 

>
> On 9/18/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, I think it does.  It implies that you had some clear intention in
the
> > creation of the work, and that the result met your expectations.  Of
> > course, sometimes there's the fortuitous accident, but overall, to me at
> > least, knowing why you like your own work indicates an understanding of
> > what you've done, and the ability to perhaps honestly critique it.
> > 
>
> But, what difference does it make to you, as a viewer, knowing what
> the intention of an artist might have been when a work was created?
>
> If I go to an art gallery, it matters not a whit what was going
> through the artist's mind during the conception and creation of
> his/her work.  There it is, up on a wall, and I look at it.  I like
> it, or I don't.  I may "get into it", and stare for hours.  I may
> wonder what the artist was "trying to say", but I get that from the
> work, not from the artist.  What I "get" may be far different than
> what (if anything) the artist was trying to say, but that doesn't
> invalidate the work or the artist.
>
> Again, not to beat a dead horse (but you keep bringing these things
> up), I don't think that it's up to an artist to critique his/her own
> work - that's for critics.  An artist creates art (or in my case, "a
> photographer creates photographs").  If I could explain why I liked
> some of my photos, I'd probably be a writer, not a photographer.  Or a
> critic.
>
> cheers,
> frank
> -- 
> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson


Reply via email to