Toralf Lund wrote on 04.10.05 10:06: > I must admit that although I've tried some of the never Canons and > Nikons, I've only shot a couple of pictures with each. I wasn't > immediately struck by any important differences in the AF, though. > Quieter, perhaps, but "more efficient"? USM is not faster, at least until you have very long lens with heavy optics. It is in-camera AF system that is responsible for accurate and sure focusing. Differencies in AF performance are visible in low light. Here from what I've tried so far Nikon performs best with their CAM-2000 system used in D2 series DSLRs and in F6. It has identical number, type and placement of AF sensors as in Safox VIII used in istD, but the difference in performance under low light is huge in favour of Nikon.
-- Balance is the ultimate good... Best Regards Sylwek
