Toralf Lund wrote on 04.10.05 14:20: > So what makes up the difference, then? It can hardly be the motor (which > would be my main point, really), nor the sensors if they are really the > same. Processing power? Is focusing in low light more demanding? Or is > what you are saying that Nikon seems to use an algorithm that's *more > accurate* with the limited input associated with low-light conditions? We don't know if real circuit used in Nikon is identical to that used in Pentax. On the outside they look the same except for performance. So we don't know if it is used alghoritm or ciurcuit that makes this difference. But anyway now we know that Pentax can still improve it at least to match Nikon's performance.
-- Balance is the ultimate good... Best Regards Sylwek
