Hi Mark I read here that people think that their photographs are simply not good enough for the PUG. Some even think they can not comment on the PUG entries for the same reason. I did not see anybody mentioning that the themes are too abstract in general.
Maybe clarifying what level of photographic quality the PUG expects would help? What do you think? greetings Markus >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 4:08 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: shall PUG continue? >> >> >>I like the PUG and think it's a great way to show off what Pentax gear >>and Pentax photographers can do. Being much more public than the >>PESO/GESO photographs is a good thing, IMHO. In fact, perhaps we should >>promote its existence a bit more outside the PDML. >>So, I promise to submit a shot for next month's PUG. >> >>That said, I believe that gallery themes that are a little bit less >>abstract would encourage more people to participate. I'm a pretty >>abstract thinker (especially after a couple of Bill Owens' home brews!) >>and I'm having trouble coming up with something for "Useless". Perhaps a >>shot of my K2 and a CF card? <g> >> >> >> >>-- >>Mark Roberts >>Photography and writing >>www.robertstech.com >>
