One problem with commenting on the PUG versus a PESO is the amount of time necessary. When confronted with a single picture, you can quickly look and make a comment on it. When confronted with an entire gallery (especially when the gallery is large), it takes much more time to even look at all the pictures, let alone trying to comment on them. So what tends to happen is many may look but not make the attempt to comment. Others will just comment on a few that they liked the best. One or two brave souls have attempted to comment on all photos. That takes a large amount of time or the comments end up being less meaningful.
I think the popularity of PESO-PAW is the fact that you can post an image when you make it instead of waiting for the next gallery - coupled with the lack of themes. While the theme has value, it also makes it so many photos will not be submitted because they don't fit the theme. Anyway, people not commenting on your photo can be just as much that the volume of the gallery is too large as it is that they may not like your photo as well as others. -- Best regards, Bruce Sunday, October 9, 2005, 11:53:37 AM, you wrote: ERNR> Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >>If as many people comment on the PUG as comment on the PAWs and >>PESOs,etc, more people would take the trouble to enter the PUG every >>month. >> >> >> >> ERNR> Certainly I stopped submitting to the PUG because mine were no longer ERNR> getting any comments at all. I took that to mean my stuff wasn't good ERNR> enough to bother with, and decided not to continue inflicting it on the ERNR> community. Same reason I haven't posted a Picture in EVER So ... long. ERNR> ERNR
