I don't think anyone has more than one model, although some of us have
two cameras. I would still opt for a D, because I need continuous
autofocus in all modes, and I like to be able to work the aps and
shutter speed with separate dials when shooting in program mode. I'm
also quite dependent on having the battery grip and the reserve energy
supply it provides. If those factors aren't important, the *istDS2 is
the obvious choce.
Paul
On Oct 16, 2005, at 3:50 PM, keithw wrote:
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
@ Cord Camera here in Columbus there's an excellent D now marked @
$549.
Collin
At 14:27 2005.10.16 -0400, you wrote:
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:10:28 -0700
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
I was just poking around the KEH site and saw a LN- (Like New Minus)
istD
for $665.00. That's pretty close to1/2 the price of a new one, and
considering the KEH reputation, seems like someone here might want
to grab
it.
Shel
For those of you who have all the *ist D's, is there a consensus that
one is any better than the other?
What is there, the original *istD, the DL, the DS & DS2, any more?
If you were buying today, would you choose one over the others? And
why?
keith whaley
