Billy,
There is no disagreement. Its still agreement, I'm just pointing out
the greyer elements of privacy vs freedom.
rg
William Robb wrote:
Gonzo,
How can you agree with this statement, and then in another post, same
topic, written three minutes earlier, disagree with it?
I am amazed.
William Robb
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gonz"
Subject: Re: More Texas Photo Issues
Exactly.
Bob Blakely wrote:
You can't have a reasonable right to privacy anywhere you can't have
a reasonable expectation of privacy. Not law, just logic. If you are
in a place where the expectation of privacy is reasonable, you have
it. On a public street, you have no expectation of privacy concerning
what other people may see or hear. You do have a reasonable
expectation of privacy concerning the contents of your pocket. You
have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a stall in a public john
concerning what may be seen, but no expectation of privacy concerning
what may be overheard. Women in skirts (and Scots in kilts) have a
reasonable expectation of privacy concerning what they are wearing
(or not) under their skirts/kilts. No shoe cams allowed. (this crap
was going on in Toronto when I lived there.)
